![]() On the other hand, the T4c, with its higher output and battery runtime, are better suited as fill or key lights when users need a higher output tube form factor. These differences make the Pixel Tubes better suited to accent lighting within the scene, or even practical lighting provided its smaller form factor and multiple light engines. The external battery of the T4c also allows users to swap out batteries for a full charge quickly and enables the T4c to use a larger 77Wh battery, while the integrated batteries of the Pixel Tubes give them a cleaner look that works better for in-camera practical lights. In terms of battery life and output, the T4c are more powerful than their Pixel Tube counterparts, partly due to the not needing to account for heat management of batteries within the tube housings. The Pixel Tubes’ individual light engines allow them to be used in more dynamic lighting scenarios requiring Pixel FX. The key differentiator between these two lights is the inclusion of multiple light engines and integrated batteries in the Pixel Tubes compared to the T4c. ![]() ![]() ![]() While the T4c and PT4c are both amaran tube lights, they have several points of differentiation regarding performance and application. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |